A British Columbia First Nation is withdrawing its support for a $1.35-billion liquefied gas export terminal, arguing that its consent for the project was “unlawfully obtained.”
Chief Robert Nelson says the Metlakatla First Nation has told the provincial and federal regulators that it will “oppose all future authorizations and permits required for the operation” of the Ridley Island Energy Export Facility (REEF), which is currently under construction near Prince Rupert.
The export terminal, a joint venture between Calgary’s AltaGas and Netherlands-based Vopak, will ship liquefied propane and butane to Asia when it begins operating later this year.
But the First Nation says it can no longer support the project after learning of what it calls an undisclosed “export monopoly” agreement between the companies and the Prince Rupert Port Authority (PRPA), where the project is located.
The port authority granted exclusive rights to export liquefied petroleum gas to Vopak in 2015. The Dutch company subsequently entered into the joint venture with AltaGas.
The Metlakatla First Nation says the agreement gives the companies the power to “arbitrarily veto” any other project that proposes to export energy through the port.
The nation says it discovered the agreement in 2023, when the port authority rejected an application from Trigon Pacific Terminals Limited, a bulk energy exporter that is partly owned by the Metlakatla, to ship liquefied petroleum gas from the port.
In a statement Wednesday, the Metlakatla chief councillor said the nation “would have strongly opposed” the Ridley Island project had it known about the exclusivity agreement beforehand.
“If we had learned about the export monopoly during the REEF consultation process, we would not have consented to the REEF project,” Nelson said, arguing the exclusivity deal is hindering Canadian investment in the energy sector.
In a statement responding to the Metlakatla, AltaGas executive vice-president and president of midstream Randy Toone described the company as “deeply disappointed” by the First Nation’s negative characterization of the relationship between the two entities.
Toone said the nation’s claim that it had withdrawn consent for REEF “is not factually or legally accurate,” noting that the nation did not file challenges to the approval of the project “within the statutory time frame required.”
“If a project could receive full consent and regulatory approval—only to have that consent withdrawn years later with government support allowing that change—it would fundamentally undermine the rule of law and would severely damage Canada’s investment climate across industries,” Toone said.
“Long-term capital depends on stability, predictability, and confidence that once regulatory approval is granted, it will be respected. This certainty was central to our decision to invest in Prince Rupert and continues to underpin our long-term commitment to energy development in the area.”
Read the full article: B.C. First Nation withdraws support for liquefied gas export facility